USPTO serial 75634339
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam L Brookman
ADAM L BROOKMAN GODFREY & KAHN SC780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Granulated licorice extract for use in the manufacture of food and tobacco; food ingredients, namely, carregeenan mixture for replacing animal fat for use in the manufacture of meat products | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pullover tops, jackets, shorts, pants and headwear, namely, hats and caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Butter extract; butter flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Food spices dispensed in a container by means of shaking, namely, salt, pepper, powdered onion, powdered garlic; food and bakery ingredients, namely, food starch, malt extracts for food, ground cinnamon, allspice, ginger, nutmeg, mace, vanilla extract, lemon extract, orange extract, additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring or ingredient; food service packaged spices and seasonings, namely, salt, pepper, powdered onion, powdered garlic, ground cinnamon, allspice, ginger, nutmeg; gravy mixes; extracts, namely, malt extracts used for food, vanilla extract, lemon extract, orange extract; wholesale and commodity spices and ingredients, namely, salt, pepper, powdered onion, powdered garlic, ground cinnamon, allspice, ginger, nutmeg, mace; seasonings for use on popcorn, namely, salt, powdered white cheddar cheese | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic cocktail concentrates used in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Prepared light alcoholic cocktail; rum extract | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Merchandise packaging, namely, packaging of food ingredients and inventory management consultation, namely, providing inventory management programs for others; retail store services featuring the sale of spices and seasonings; distributorships featuring food and food ingredients | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacturing of pharmaceutical chemicals; food processing, namely, flavor processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Product development, namely, flavor development, design and testing for new product development and packaging development and design | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |