USPTO serial 75634369
EYE MUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EYE MUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Thomas Kammer
A THOMAS KAMMER HOFFMAN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY EYE GEL | ACTIVE | Sep 12, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |