Drawing for BEYONDCHAT

USPTO serial 75634375

BEYONDCHAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEYONDCHAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark B. Harrison

MARK B HARRISONSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENABLE COMMUNICATION VIA THE INTERNET OR OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE PROVISION AND DISSEMINATION OF DATABASES OR DIRECTORIES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE NETWORKING OF VISUAL IMAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN FACILITATING INTRODUCTIONS AND/OR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, AND/OR FOR THE PROVISION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT OTHERSACTIVE—
042SERVICES PROVIDED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS; PROVISION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT OTHERS BY COMPUTER NETWORK, OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS; INTRODUCTION SERVICES VIA COMPUTER OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS; PROVISION AND DISSEMINATION OF DATABASES, DIRECTORIES OR VISUAL IMAGES BY ELECTRONIC MEANS; COMMUNICATION SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET OR OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance