USPTO serial 75634383
VIRTUAL DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton J. Rosenberg
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & BILKER3444 ELLICOTT CTR DRSTE 105ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY COMPUTER DRIVE SOFTWARE FOR WEB BROWSING ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, CREATING AND MODIFYING WEB PAGES, DISK CACHING AND CD-ROM CACHING; CACHE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, NAMELY A CONTROLLER, HIGH AND LOW SPEED DIGITAL STORAGE MEMORIES; COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTERS, MICROCOMPUTERS, IC MOTHERBOARDS, HARD DRIVES, MAGNETIC OPTICAL DRIVES, CD-ROM DRIVES, PRINTERS, PLOTTERS, CD-RECORDER DRIVES, FLOPPY DISC DRIVES, CACHE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CONTROLLERS, COMPUTER INTERFACE CONTROLLERS | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |