USPTO serial 75634668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Wolf
DAVID WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PCFEDERAL RESERVE PLZ600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | canned and bottled fruit nectars, namely, Pear, Peach, Apricot, Mango, Guava, Pineapple, Apple, Strawberry, Raspberry, Banana, Papaya, Guanabana, Black Currant, Plum, Orange Mango, Orange Guava, Strawberry Banana, Raspberry Banana, Papaya Pineapple, Papaya Pear, Papaya Peach, Papaya Apricot, Strawberry Orange Mango, Strawberry Orange Banana | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 23, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |