USPTO serial 75634780
ARMOR VAULT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARMOR VAULT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas L. Tschida
DOUGLAS L TSCHIDALARPENTEUR AVE W STE BSAINT PAUL, MN 55113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Concrete support bases and concrete storage containers for use in the field of storage of environmental contaminants; namely, fuel, waste oil, anti-freeze, chemicals and flammable liquids; concrete encased metal storage containers; and metal forms for use in casting concrete products, such as storage containers and support bases therefore; and concrete encased, non-metallic storage containers for commercial, industrial and agricultural use and for use in the field of storage of environmental contaminants; namely, fuel, waste oil, anti-freeze, chemicals and flammable liquids | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |