USPTO serial 75634986
MB ORIGINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MB ORIGINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKIP O BOX 375CANTON, CT 06019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TELEVISIONS, CD-PLAYERS, STEREOS, MICROPHONES, HEADPHONES, VCR'S DVD PLAYERS, CAMCORDERS, TAPE RECORDERS, CASSETTE RECORDERS, CD RECORDERS; STEREO COMPONENTS, NAMELY, STEREO AMPLIFIERS, STEREO RECEIVERS, AUDIO SPEAKERS, CD ROM CHANGER; TURNTABLES, NAMELY, PHONOGRAPH RECORD PLAYERS AND CD PLAYERS; DRIVE UNITS, NAMELY, COMPUTER DISC DRIVE UNITS; CABLES, NAMELY COMPUTER CABLES, FIBER OPTIC CABLES AND ELECTRICAL CABLES; AND CONNECTORS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |