Drawing for CORE CONDITIONING

USPTO serial 75635042

CORE CONDITIONING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE CONDITIONING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura C. Gustafson

LAURA C GUSTAFSON CALENDAR/DOCKET DEPTPILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028EXERCISE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY MATS, YOGA BLOCKS, YOGA STRAPS AND PRERECORDED TAPES FEATURING EXERCISE INSTRUCTION, SOLD TOGETHER AS A UNITACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 19, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 28, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 3, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 18, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance