USPTO serial 75635227
MALDEN MILLS GENUINE ORIGINAL POLARFLEECE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2567829Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 2002
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MALDEN MILLS GENUINE ORIGINAL POLARFLEECE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LAWRENCE, MA
Burlington, VT
Burlington, VT
Burlington, VT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phi Lan M. Tinsley
Phi Lan M. Tinsley Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates EllState Street Financial CenterOne Lincoln StreetBoston, MA 02111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textile fabric piece goods for use in the manufacture of clothing and home furnishings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MMI-IPCO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ADS PROPERTIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ADS PROPERTIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by ADS PROPERTIES CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named MALDEN MILLS GENUINE ORIGINAL POLARFLEECE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 22, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |