USPTO serial 75635339
ATRIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATRIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin J. Canning
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use with medical practice patient outcomes software, clinical laboratory database, and PDA (PALM) billing software | ABANDONED | Oct 31, 1995 |
| 010 | medical devices, namely aortic punches; angioplasty balloon catheters and angiography catheters; hemodialysis machines, cassettes, needles, needle introducers, filters, tubing and access ports; I;V; pole adapter mechanisms; drug delivery catheters; implantable drug pumps; irrigation catheters; mechanical punches for creating openings in tissues; mechanical thrombectomy devices; medical stents, namely coronary stents, carotid stents, aortic stents, iliac stents, renal stents, biliary stents, vascular and arterial stents, urethral stents, esophageal stents, and intestinal stents; drug delivery stents; catheter, stent and graft deployment instruments and sheaths; tissue repair materials, tubes and membranes made of surgical mesh and PTFE for medical or surgical use; stabilizing mechanisms for a thoracic cavity drain; and thrombectomy and embolectomy balloon catheters | ABANDONED | Dec 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |