USPTO serial 75635345
GINGER CHEWIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2000
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GINGER CHEWIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. LOUIS, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
LOFTHOUSE BAKERY PRODUCTS, INC.
ST. LOUIS, MO
Ogden, UT
Ogden, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Michael Mullen
Angela M. Hattan, Legal Assistant Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.800 Market StreetSt. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | line of food products, namely, cookies and cakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 21, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BREMNER, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BREMNER FOOD GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LOFTHOUSE BAKERY PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Lofthouse Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Lofthouse Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named GINGER CHEWIE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 23, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |