Drawing for CODESPAN

USPTO serial 75635375

CODESPAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODESPAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

JOHN J O'MALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG, PC400 ONE PENN CTR1617 JOHN F KENNEDY BLVDPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WIRELESS AND DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS COMPRISING BASE STATIONS COMPRISED OF RECEIVERS AND TRANSMITTERS, REMOTE SUBSCRIBER UNITS, RADIO CARRIER STATIONS COMPRISING TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, AND REMOTE MODULAR CLUSTER UNITS; WIRELESS AND DIGITAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY PORTABLE AND STATIONARY RADIOTELEPHONES, ENCODERS, DECODERS, MODULATORS, DEMODULATORS, TELEPHONE LINE CONNECTORS, TELEPHONE SWITCHING TERMINALS, RADIO CORRELATORS, ELECTRONIC SYNCHRONIZERS FOR WIRELESS AND DIGITAL COMMUNICATION, RADIO TRANSMITTERS, RADIO RECEIVERS, SWITCHES, HANDSETS, ANTENNAS, COMPUTER PROCESSORS, AND COMPUTER SUBSCRIBER STATIONS COMPRISED OF COMPUTERS, TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS, SOFTWARE FOR OPERATING THE FOREGOING EQUIPMENT; RADIOTELEPHONE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY BATTERIES, MICROPHONES, AND SPEAKERSACTIVE—
042DESIGNING, ENGINEERING, AND TESTING TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT, AND COMPONENTS FOR OTHERS; AND LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TO OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 10, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance