Drawing for FRESH DIRECT

USPTO serial 75635840

FRESH DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REDDICK, KIMBERLY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pierre C. Van Rysselberghe

PIERRE C VAN RYSSELBERGHE KOLISCH, HARTWELL, DICKINSON, ET AL200 PACIFIC BLDG520 S W YAMHILL STPORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008products and product distribution servicesACTIVE
021products and product distribution servicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
025products and product distribution servicesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
029food products, namely, olive oil, olives, herbs, herb kits, dried apricots, and dried figsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
030food productsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
031food productsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED
032food productsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Dec 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance