Drawing for HEMACHARGE

USPTO serial 75635894

HEMACHARGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEMACHARGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Donald Weber, Jr

G DONALD WEBER JR18442 TAFT AVEVILLA PARK, CA 92861-2759UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, extra corporeal devices to treat blood borne infections, namely, ultra violet (UV), irradiators and blood filtersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 19, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 1, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 1, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 6, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 7, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 11, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance