Drawing for IDSERVER

USPTO serial 75636583

IDSERVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAMB, PAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IDSERVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL R. COOK, Esq.

DANIEL R COOK ESQ GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP400 HAMILTON AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1825UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for data management, tracking and transmission for use in the field of online marketingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
May 25, 2000OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 9, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 21, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Aug 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance