USPTO serial 75637072
CONXUS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONXUS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard A. Jacobson
HOWARD A JACOBSON MOORE & VAN ALLENP O BOX 26507RALEIGH, NC 27611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Personal communication wireless and paging equipment, telephone pagers and text and numeric pagers, namely, voice, electronic message and telephone; computer software for activating, deactivating, managing, modifying and determining the status of paging devices and services; computer software in the field of customer billing and account maintenance and analysis | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Newsletters concerning paging devices and services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, wireless voice and data transmission, paging services, voice mail services, and electronic voice messaging, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by pager, and the management, activation, deactivation, modification, determination of the status of and testing of paging devices and services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |