USPTO serial 75637509
Serial No. 75637509
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75637509?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle E. Brownlee
MICHELLE E BROWNLEE COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing an on-line electronic bulletin board for transmission of messages among computer users in the fields of software, product design, space design, simulation and games, and teaching and training using simulation models, processes and systems, and interactive games and stories; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages and real-time interaction among computer users concerning topics of general interest | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for web page authoring, for software development, for computer games, for creating, designing modifying and using simulation models of processes and systems in the fields of math, science, linguistics, history, social science, sports, urban design, architecture, engineering, communications, government, finance, business operations and business management, and for education in the fields of reading, writing, math, science, history, social science, language instruction, art, music, sports, computer science, adaptive learning, critical thinking, problem solving, drama, multimedia design, health care, urban design, architecture, engineering, communications, law, finance, business, management, vehicular skills, teaching skills, clerical skills, manufacturing skills in a wide variety of areas, maintenance and repair skills in a wide variety of areas, customer service skills, public service skills and organizational skills | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |