USPTO serial 75637795
UNISOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNISOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chunan-City Chungchongnam-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence H. Binderow
LAWRENCE H BINDEROWP O BOX 2530DEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | Tarpaulins (excluding awnings) | ACTIVE | Feb 17, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |