USPTO serial 75638341
NU-WEST NATURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NU-WEST NATURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. Kennedy, Esq.
JAMES E KENNEDY KENNEDY HARRIS & MILLER10900 NE 8TH ST STE 900BELLEVUE, WA 98004-4448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Natural herbal transdermal patches for use in the temporary relief of minor aches and pains | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nu-West Natural Products Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Nu-West Natural Products Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named NU-WEST NATURAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |