USPTO serial 75638386
SOUND SURGICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUND SURGICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical instrument, namely, an ultrasonic surgical system consisting of an ultrasonic surgical instrument to cut, fragment, and coagulate tissue, irrigator and aspirator | ACTIVE | May 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |