Drawing for TOTALSEAT

USPTO serial 75639763

TOTALSEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PASKEL, SHANETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTALSEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Christopher Lynch

J CHRISTOPHER LYNCH WYRICK ROBBINS YATES & PONTON LLP4101 LAKE BOONE TRAIL, STE 300RALEIGH, NC 27607UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive games comprised of computer hardware and software in the field of sports and entertainment informationACTIVE
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 29, 2000ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 17, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 20, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance