USPTO serial 75640608
TASK TARGETED AUTOMATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TASK TARGETED AUTOMATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GERALD W. ROBERTS
GERALD W ROBERTS BOSE MCKINNEY & EVANS LLP1 ST INDIANA135 N PENNSYLVANIA STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2400Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | automated clinical laboratory equipment, namely, apparatus for centrifuging, decapping, aliquoting, sorting and archiving medical specimens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named TASK TARGETED AUTOMATION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |