Drawing for I AM LAGERFELD

USPTO serial 75641011

I AM LAGERFELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I AM LAGERFELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003soaps, namely, toilet soaps, skin soaps, body soaps, shaving soaps; perfumes, colognes, eau de toilette; non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, skin creams, skin lotions, body shampoos, body lotions, moisturizers, exfoliators, skin toners, skin cleansers and body spray; preparations for the bath and shower, namely, shower gel, bath gel, bath oils, shower foams, bath foams, non-medicated bath salts, talcum powders; preparations for the hair, namely, shampoo, conditioners, hair gels, hair toners, hair styling mousses, hair sprays; anti-perspirants, deodorants for personal use; shaving preparations; after-shave preparations, namely, after-shave lotions and after-shave balmsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2000ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance