USPTO serial 75641238
QUIETLY IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUIETLY IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the manufacture of agricultural fungicides, herbicides, insecticides; chemicals for use in the manufacture of biocides; chemicals for use in the manufacture of paints, coatings, adhesives; chemicals for use in the manufacture of water treatment polymers for further use in the manufacture of detergents, personal care products; oil field chemicals; leather tanning substances; unprocessed artificial resins for use in the industrial arts; ion exchange resins for industrial and home water treatment, for research and pharmaceutical production and food processing, and for separation, filtration and purification of liquids and solids; chemical additives and modifiers for use in the manufacture of plastic compositions and articles of manufacture; chemicals for use in the manufacture of electronic components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |