USPTO serial 75641436
ECONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VERNON HILLS, IL
Vernon Hills, IL
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jovan N. Jovanovic
MARK A FISCHER PALMER & DODGE LLPONE BEACON STBOSTON, MA 02108-3190UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS TO BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ABANDONED | Feb 11, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WP HOLDING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUPERHIGHWAY CONSULTING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by YESMAIL.COM.INC.
- Other trademarks owned by YESMAIL.COM.INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ECONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |