USPTO serial 75641647
BEACHCLUB ALOHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEACHCLUB ALOHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin L. Stem
MARTIN L STEM MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLC401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611-4260UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FROZEN FRUIT JUICE CONCENTRATES AND FROZEN NON-ALCOHOLIC FRUIT AND JUICE BLENDED COCKTAIL MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |