Drawing for SANALYZER

USPTO serial 75641735

SANALYZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SANALYZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert Dulaney

ROBERT DULANEY LAW DEPT DATA GENERAL CORPORATION4400 COMPUTER DRWESTBORO, MA 01580UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for monitoring the operation and status of computer hardware connected to a computer network and controlling the network to improve networkACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 27, 2001GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance