USPTO serial 75642140
BENSALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BENSALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Ellis
HOWARD M ELLIS LAW OFFICE OF HOWARD M ELLIS200 JOHN JAMES AUDUBON PKWYSTE 104AMHERST, NY 14228Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Premanufactured high temperature ceramic components, consisting of sleeves, filters, bearings, protection tubes, immersion tubes, nozzles, sliding gates used in flow control, casting rings, riser tubes, crucibles and liners, all for use in molten metal handling systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Premanufactured high temperature ceramic components, consisting of muffle tubes, kiln furniture, saggers, boxes, beams, setters, thermocouple protection tubes, crucibles and plates, all for use in industrial furnaces, kilns, ovens and incinerators; premanufactured high temperature ceramic components consisting of seals and filters for use in heat exchangers; premanufactured high temperature ceramic components consisting of ceramic filters and fitted ceramic liners for machines used in connection with high temperature applications for use in power generation equipment and equipment used in oil exploration and production | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Premanufactured high temperature resistant ceramic shapes manufactured from sialon-based composite materials for use in refractory furnaces and related equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Benchmark Structural Ceramics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Benchmark Structural Ceramics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named BENSALON
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |