USPTO serial 75642444
BABY HIDE N' PEEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY HIDE N' PEEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Rabkin
RICHARD M RABKIN245 DELAWARE STWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Dolls, Doll Clothing and Doll Accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |