USPTO serial 75643493
Serial No. 75643493
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75643493?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
RICHARD J MCKENNA FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Pre-print and print management provided to others, namely, (a) providing data storage, disaster recovery , content management and workflow automation services over a wide area network, and (b) providing on-line computer databases for use by others in the field of desktop publishing printing and pre-print management applications, including digital content management, digital proofing and computer-go-plate digital plate making | ACTIVE | Dec 4, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |