USPTO serial 75643710
ALLBUSINESS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLBUSINESS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory N. Owen
GREGORY N OWEN OWEN, WICKERSHAM AND ERICKSON, PC455 MARKET ST 19TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING, MAINTAINING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR RETRIEVING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTERS, NEWSPAPER, TRADE JOURNALS, CIRCULARS, AND REPORTS CONTAINING SUMMARIES AND ANNOTATIONS, ALL IN THE FIELD OF START-UP, EMERGING AND GROWTH BUSINESSES AND THE MANAGEMENT OF START-UP, EMERGING AND GROWTH BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |