USPTO serial 75644758
QUANTUMLYNX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUMLYNX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen H. Sorensen
KRISTEN H SORENSEN HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166-0136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for providing access to online databases, for providing access to a global computer information network, for a secure system for information providers to distribute and transmit their applications,data and services to on-line consumers, and for the capture of business metrics associated with access by consumers on-line to databases, application and services of information providers such as billing information and consumer service preferences, and manuals and guides sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |