USPTO serial 75644809
STONEWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STONEWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Ryan
RICHARD A RYAN RYAN & ENGNATH8469 N MILLBROOK STE 104FRESNO, CA 93720UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely above-grade exterior decking surface materials made of concrete and used as a substitute for wood floor boards in the construction of decks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |