Drawing for DISTRIBUTED NONSTOP ARCHITECTURE

USPTO serial 75644934

DISTRIBUTED NONSTOP ARCHITECTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISTRIBUTED NONSTOP ARCHITECTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin Oelsner

BENJAMIN OELSNER BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR1 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-1420

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for customer management and billing for use in connection with provision of services over the global communications network, and related software development tools, namely, graphical interface software tools that facilitate customization, including application programming interfaces, sample source codes, tutorials, and procedural checklists; and instruction and user manuals sold together in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 18, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 3, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jan 25, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 9, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 13, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance