USPTO serial 75645244
@MOSPHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2649780Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2002
- Examiner
- DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with @MOSPHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario N5W 5S1, CA
London, Ontario N5W 5S1, CA
London, Ontario N5W 5S1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen H Sorensen
Morlee Group. Inc.340 Sovereign RoadLondon, Ontario, N5W 551CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair shampoo, conditioner, body wash, body lotion, hand and body cream, and bath additives, foam bath, bath salts | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |