USPTO serial 75645528
VIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah S. Shepherd
Deborah S. Shepherd KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLPFOURTEENTH FLOOR2040 MAIN STREETIRVINE, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CELLULAR TELEPHONES, CELLULAR RECEPTION AND TRANSMISSION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TELEPHONES USED BY END USERS; AUDIO PROCESSING CIRCUITRY FOR CELLULAR TELEPHONES, TELEPHONES, MICROPHONES, CONFERENCE SPEAKERS, PUBLIC ADDRESS SPEAKERS, PUBLIC ADDRESS AUDIO PROCESSORS, PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS, AUDIO PROCESSORS AND SPEAKERS; HEARING AID DEVICES; INTERCOM SYSTEMS; HEADPHONES; RADIOS, WALKIE-TALKIES, CITIZEN BAND RADIOS, MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, AMPLIFIERS, RECEIVERS AND SPEAKERS ANSWERING MACHINES, DIGITAL SOUND AMPLIFIERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCAS | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED STAT IS TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |