USPTO serial 75645670
QUANTUM ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325036Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUANTUM ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam H. Jacobs
Adam H. Jacobs STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT, SUITE 2900STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORKANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely investment, life and health insurance underwriting, insurance brokerage, life and health insurance claims administration and investment brokerage services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QA3, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by QA3, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Financial Continuum, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Financial Continuum, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named QUANTUM ALLIANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 23, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |