USPTO serial 75646052
SEDIMENTARY WALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEDIMENTARY WALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kit M. Stetina
KIT M STETINA STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PERTAINING TO ARCHITECTURAL CONCRETE SURFACES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |