USPTO serial 75646479
SUMMIT BOATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUMMIT BOATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILMINGTON, DE
BRUNSWICK BILLIARDS RECREATION, INC.
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK BILLIARDS RECREATION, INC.
ASHLAND CITY LAND AND BRAND PARTNERS
ASHLAND CITY, TN
Other trademarks owned by ASHLAND CITY LAND AND BRAND PARTNERS
Ashland City, TN
Ashland City, TN
Ashland City, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Neely
ANDREW S NEELY LUEDEKA, NEELY & GRAHAM, PCP O BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | boats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BRUNSWICK BILLIARDS RECREATION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHLAND CITY LAND AND BRAND PARTNERS
- Other trademarks owned by Triton Boat Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Triton Boat Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Triton Boat Company, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SUMMIT BOATS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |