USPTO serial 75646542
MEGA-LIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEGA-LIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Thomas Kammer
A THOMAS KAMMER HOFFMANN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TKPESYOSSET, NY 11791UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY CREAMS, LOTIONS AND GELS; COSMETIC PRODUCTS, NAMELY MAKEUP | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |