Drawing for SAN MIGUEL

USPTO serial 75646768

SAN MIGUEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAN MIGUEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029butter, milk-based jam spread, namely, dulce de leche, cheese and yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 20, 2005CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 23, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 9, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance