USPTO serial 75646797
VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2703381Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 8, 2003
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London ECIM 7AD, GB
London ECIM 7AD, GB
London ECIM 7AD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith W. Medansky
KEITH W MEDANSKY RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Travel agency services, namely, arranging flights, travel tours and cruises for others; tourist agency services; organizing travel tours; conducting sightseeing tours for others; transportation ticket reservation services; booking agency services for travel; rental of cars and passenger vans; packaging of wine for transport for others, storage of wine for others, transport and delivery of wine by van, truck, ship and air | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Restaurant, bar and catering services; cigar parlor and lounge services; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; providing information relating to wine to others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wineworld London Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Wineworld London Plc
- Other trademarks owned by Wineworld London Plc
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VINOPOLIS CITY OF WINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |