USPTO serial 75647109
THE ULTIMATE WINERY SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ULTIMATE WINERY SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ultimate Winery System Inc., The
London, Ontario, N6L 1C1, CA
Ultimate Winery System Inc., The
London, Ontario, N6L 1C1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paula J. Krasny
PAULA J KRASNY BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 3500130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Automated winemaking systems for restaurants, hotels, clubs, pubs, and other eating establishments comprised of a tank, water filter system, and wine filter system, all contained in a proprietary housing, and testing, mixing, clarifying, and bottling systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair, installation, and maintenance of wine making machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely providing classes and seminars in the fields of winemaking and the operation of winemaking machinery and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ultimate Winery System Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by Ultimate Winery System Inc., The
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE ULTIMATE WINERY SYSTEM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |