USPTO serial 75647144
RISUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2767020Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RISUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Falmouth, ME
Falmouth, ME
Falmouth, ME
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. Bacall
CHARLES P BACALL VERRILL & DANA LLPONE PORTLAND SQP O BOX 586PORTLAND, ME 04112-0586Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and training services, namely, conducting seminars and classes in the fields of computing, electronic data processing, software development, enterprise resource management, distributed network computing, communications and database management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 26, 2003 |
| 042 | Computer consulting services and computer software design, development, implementation and integration for others all in the fields of electronic data processing, enterprise resource management, distributed network computing, communications and database management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |