USPTO serial 75647888
THE E-BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE E-BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | computer education training services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely providing computer consulting services, computer support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and computer software problems via telephone and email, computer software design for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |