Drawing for THE E-BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM

USPTO serial 75647888

THE E-BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE E-BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE PLATFORM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041computer education training servicesACTIVE—
042computer services, namely providing computer consulting services, computer support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and computer software problems via telephone and email, computer software design for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 15, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 4, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 1, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance