USPTO serial 75647943
THE SAN FRANCISCO CHOCOLATE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3038616Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 2006
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE SAN FRANCISCO CHOCOLATE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Green
PHILIP R GREEN LAW OFFICES OF GREEN & GREEN1000 FOURTH ST STE 595SAN RAFAEL, CA 94901-3136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHOCOLATES, CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES AND CANDIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |