Drawing for DISCOVERY HEALTH ONLINE

USPTO serial 75648188

DISCOVERY HEALTH ONLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY HEALTH ONLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony V. Lupo

ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035providing on-line retail store services featuring health and wellness products, such as medications, personal care products, homeopathic products, vitamins, aromatherapy products, over-the-counter medications, bath and body products, skin care products, and massage productsACTIVE—
038providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning health and wellness goods and services such as medications, prescribed and over-the-counter, personal care products, homeopathic products, vitamins, aromatherapy products, bath and body products, skin products and massage productsACTIVE—
042providing information in the fields of health and wellness via the global computer information networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance