Drawing for N

USPTO serial 75648245

N

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with N?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bingham B. Leverich

BINGHAM B LEVERICH COVINGTON & BURLING2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Hats, caps, jackets, anoraks, sweaters, sweatshirts, t-shirts, polo shirts, work shirts, headbands, sweatbands and shortsACTIVE—
041Television program series in the field of the outdoors, active sports, exploration and discoveryACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, online publication of magazine articles and columns in the field of the outdoors, active sports, exploration and discoveryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 18, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 18, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2001REINREINSTATED—
Apr 10, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 13, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 18, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 1999DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 1999DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance