USPTO serial 75648570
SIMON SEAL OF SUPERIORITY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS MERCHANT RESOURCE NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMON SEAL OF SUPERIORITY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS MERCHANT RESOURCE NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA HEBAN
LINDA HEBAN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKER STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | PROVIDING SERVICES TO MALL RETAILERS, NAMELY, CLEANING SERVICES FOR OFFICES AND RETAIL SPACE, TRASH COLLECTION, INTERIOR PAINTING OF COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND RETAIL SPACE, COMMERCIAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE, PLUMBING SERVICES, INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, AND DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Simon Property Group, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class B
- Similar marks named SIMON SEAL OF SUPERIORITY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS MERCHANT RESOURCE NETWORK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |