Drawing for WE BREW GOOD BEER.  I HOPE YOU LIKE IT

USPTO serial 75648662

WE BREW GOOD BEER. I HOPE YOU LIKE IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE BREW GOOD BEER. I HOPE YOU LIKE IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

JAY K MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, vests and hatsACTIVE—
032brewed alcoholic beverages, namely, ale beer, lager, stout, porter, and pilsnerACTIVE—
035Mail-order catalog services, online retail services, and retail store services, all in the fields of clothing, watches, luggage, glassware, baseball caps, and all-purpose hand-held utility toolsACTIVE—
041entertainment services in the nature of live dramatic, comedic and musical performances, antique shows, and beer festivalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 11, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 22, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 22, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 19, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance